Are you considering Akeneo as your PIM solution but would like to explore the alternatives available before making the ultimate decision? This article will help you compare two trusted PIM solutions with similar core features and functionality but different costs, strengths and limitations: AtroPIM and Akeneo. In this article we will analyze how these two systems differ in terms of features, price, and usability to help you make the right choice based on your business needs and budget.

Akeneo and AtroPIM – the Thing the Two Have in Common

Both AtroPIM and Akeneo are open source software solutions while offering both free versions and paid upgrades. Both system have web-based and API-focused architectures, and they are both customizable with modules. Each of the two PIMs offers both SaaS and on-premise deployment, with the last one being particularly beneficial for businesses with advanced security needs.

Key Functionality Differences of Akeneo and AtroPIM

Akeneo's Community Edition (CE) will serve well for many businesses with basic product data needs. However, advanced features for bigger enterprises or businesses with complex product data needs are not accessible without their Enterprise Edition (EE) or Growth Edition. These paid additions of Akeneo require a substantial investment.

On the other hand, AtroPIM provides multiple advanced features found in Akeneo's paid versions, either included by default or through additional modules that can be either free or paid. This includes customizable data structures, flexible dashboards, Digital Asset Management (DAM), a feature lacking in Akeneo CE and only partly accessible in the EE version.

One more thing that helps AtroPIM stand out are its advanced product management tools, enhanced collaboration capabilities, and integrated CRM and ERP features. This is a great option for businesses that are looking for a comprehensive solution without having to use various third-party integrations.

Usability and User Interface

Akeneo's user-friendliness and interface simplicity is very appealing, especially for users with limited technical background. Yet, this straightforwardness also leads to decreased adaptability. On the flip side, AtroPIM provides a sophisticated yet extremely customizable interface. The learning might be a bit steeper, but the advantage is a flexible user interface that can incorporate extra features without losing screen space. AtroPIM is the preferred option for businesses that need mobile access or want to highly personalize their system's user experience.

Data Integration and Extensibility

Both platforms have compatibility with REST APIs and provide a range of options for importing and exporting data. Akeneo is a perfect solution for handling the pre-set tasks for importing and exporting data, which facilitates the initial setup process. With that said, if your business requires complex customizations, Akeneo might not meet these requirements unless you're open to sufficient investment in custom development.

What makes AtroPIM extremely flexible is its personalized import/export setups and strong integration solutions available. Apart from that, AtroPIM offers a user-friendly API that is readily available for customization and implementing improvements while AtroPIM and Akeneo are both open-source PIM systems, offer free versions and paid upgrades. They provide architectures that are web-based and API-focused, and are both customizable with modules. Both options are available for use as either SaaS or on-premise, which is especially beneficial for businesses with advanced security needs. Akeneo necessitates additional programming for similar capabilities to be unlocked.

The Features Overview

A major drawback of Akeneo, especially its Community Edition, is its restricted features, forcing users to switch to the Enterprise Edition. The cost of transitioning to Akeneo EE can be high, totaling approximately €50,000 per year. CE users frequently have to turn to outside organizations for assistance, which increases the total cost of ownership even further.

On the other hand, AtroPIM provides immediate assistance from the product vendor AtroCore, starting at just €190 per month.

Regarding collaboration, Akeneo has few choices available. The Enterprise Edition provides simple management of workflows, especially for approval procedures, but lacks the capability for complex workflows without customization. AtroPIM offers additional collaborative functions like role-based access control, customizable workflows, and portals for suppliers and retailers, making it ideal for businesses with intricate supply chains or multiple teams.

Conclusion: Which PIM Should You Choose?

AtroPIM and Akeneo each have their own advantages, but the ideal decision will vary depending on the specific requirements of your business:

Choose Akeneo if you seek an easy-to-use, efficient PIM with a quick learning process and are willing to switch to the Enterprise Edition for more advanced functionalities.

Opt for AtroPIM if you require a PIM that is highly customizable, flexible, and capable of managing intricate data models, workflows, and integrations. AtroPIM is highly suitable for businesses with particular requirements for teamwork, extensive data handling, and a more adaptable pricing model.